A complex intervention for multimorbidity in primary care: A feasibility study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

A complex intervention for multimorbidity in primary care : A feasibility study. / Birke, Hanne; Jacobsen, Ramune; Jønsson, Alexandra Br; Guassora, Ann Dorrit Kristiane; Walther, Marie; Saxild, Thomas; Laursen, Jannie T; Vall-Lamora, Maria Helena Dominquez; Frølich, Anne.

I: Journal of Comorbidity, Bind 10, 2020.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Birke, H, Jacobsen, R, Jønsson, AB, Guassora, ADK, Walther, M, Saxild, T, Laursen, JT, Vall-Lamora, MHD & Frølich, A 2020, 'A complex intervention for multimorbidity in primary care: A feasibility study', Journal of Comorbidity, bind 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2235042X20935312

APA

Birke, H., Jacobsen, R., Jønsson, A. B., Guassora, A. D. K., Walther, M., Saxild, T., Laursen, J. T., Vall-Lamora, M. H. D., & Frølich, A. (2020). A complex intervention for multimorbidity in primary care: A feasibility study. Journal of Comorbidity, 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2235042X20935312

Vancouver

Birke H, Jacobsen R, Jønsson AB, Guassora ADK, Walther M, Saxild T o.a. A complex intervention for multimorbidity in primary care: A feasibility study. Journal of Comorbidity. 2020;10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2235042X20935312

Author

Birke, Hanne ; Jacobsen, Ramune ; Jønsson, Alexandra Br ; Guassora, Ann Dorrit Kristiane ; Walther, Marie ; Saxild, Thomas ; Laursen, Jannie T ; Vall-Lamora, Maria Helena Dominquez ; Frølich, Anne. / A complex intervention for multimorbidity in primary care : A feasibility study. I: Journal of Comorbidity. 2020 ; Bind 10.

Bibtex

@article{ef4fa4dba2de4c6d9977f2d172ccad13,
title = "A complex intervention for multimorbidity in primary care: A feasibility study",
abstract = "Aim: To assess the feasibility of a patient-centered complex intervention for multimorbidity (CIM) based on general practice in collaboration with community health-care centers and outpatient clinics.Methods: Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, diagnoses of two or more of three chronic conditions (diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and chronic heart conditions), and a hospital contact during the previous year. The CIM included extended consultations and nurse care manager support in general practice and intensified cross-sectorial collaboration. Elements included a structured care plan based on patients' care goals, coordination of services, and, if appropriate, shifting outpatient clinic visits to general practice, medication review, referral to rehabilitation, and home care. The acceptability dimension of feasibility was assessed with validated questionnaires, observations, and focus groups.Results: Forty-eight patients were included (mean age 72.2 (standard deviation (SD) 9.5, range 52-89); 23 (48%) were men. Thirty-seven patients had two diseases; most commonly COPD and cardiovascular disease (46%), followed by diabetes and cardiovascular disease (23%), and COPD and diabetes (15%). Eleven (23%) patients had all three conditions. Focus group interviews with patients with multimorbidity identified three main themes: (1) lack of care coordination existed across health-care sectors before the CIM, (2) extended consultations provided better care coordination, and (3) patients want to be involved in planning their treatment and care. In focus groups, health-care professionals discussed two main themes: (1) patient-centered care and (2) culture and organizational change. Completion rates for questionnaires were 98% (47/48).Conclusions: Patients and health-care professionals found the CIM acceptable.",
author = "Hanne Birke and Ramune Jacobsen and J{\o}nsson, {Alexandra Br} and Guassora, {Ann Dorrit Kristiane} and Marie Walther and Thomas Saxild and Laursen, {Jannie T} and Vall-Lamora, {Maria Helena Dominquez} and Anne Fr{\o}lich",
note = "{\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2020.",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1177/2235042X20935312",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "Journal of Comorbidity",
issn = "2235-042X",
publisher = "Swiss Medical Press GmbH",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A complex intervention for multimorbidity in primary care

T2 - A feasibility study

AU - Birke, Hanne

AU - Jacobsen, Ramune

AU - Jønsson, Alexandra Br

AU - Guassora, Ann Dorrit Kristiane

AU - Walther, Marie

AU - Saxild, Thomas

AU - Laursen, Jannie T

AU - Vall-Lamora, Maria Helena Dominquez

AU - Frølich, Anne

N1 - © The Author(s) 2020.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Aim: To assess the feasibility of a patient-centered complex intervention for multimorbidity (CIM) based on general practice in collaboration with community health-care centers and outpatient clinics.Methods: Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, diagnoses of two or more of three chronic conditions (diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and chronic heart conditions), and a hospital contact during the previous year. The CIM included extended consultations and nurse care manager support in general practice and intensified cross-sectorial collaboration. Elements included a structured care plan based on patients' care goals, coordination of services, and, if appropriate, shifting outpatient clinic visits to general practice, medication review, referral to rehabilitation, and home care. The acceptability dimension of feasibility was assessed with validated questionnaires, observations, and focus groups.Results: Forty-eight patients were included (mean age 72.2 (standard deviation (SD) 9.5, range 52-89); 23 (48%) were men. Thirty-seven patients had two diseases; most commonly COPD and cardiovascular disease (46%), followed by diabetes and cardiovascular disease (23%), and COPD and diabetes (15%). Eleven (23%) patients had all three conditions. Focus group interviews with patients with multimorbidity identified three main themes: (1) lack of care coordination existed across health-care sectors before the CIM, (2) extended consultations provided better care coordination, and (3) patients want to be involved in planning their treatment and care. In focus groups, health-care professionals discussed two main themes: (1) patient-centered care and (2) culture and organizational change. Completion rates for questionnaires were 98% (47/48).Conclusions: Patients and health-care professionals found the CIM acceptable.

AB - Aim: To assess the feasibility of a patient-centered complex intervention for multimorbidity (CIM) based on general practice in collaboration with community health-care centers and outpatient clinics.Methods: Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, diagnoses of two or more of three chronic conditions (diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and chronic heart conditions), and a hospital contact during the previous year. The CIM included extended consultations and nurse care manager support in general practice and intensified cross-sectorial collaboration. Elements included a structured care plan based on patients' care goals, coordination of services, and, if appropriate, shifting outpatient clinic visits to general practice, medication review, referral to rehabilitation, and home care. The acceptability dimension of feasibility was assessed with validated questionnaires, observations, and focus groups.Results: Forty-eight patients were included (mean age 72.2 (standard deviation (SD) 9.5, range 52-89); 23 (48%) were men. Thirty-seven patients had two diseases; most commonly COPD and cardiovascular disease (46%), followed by diabetes and cardiovascular disease (23%), and COPD and diabetes (15%). Eleven (23%) patients had all three conditions. Focus group interviews with patients with multimorbidity identified three main themes: (1) lack of care coordination existed across health-care sectors before the CIM, (2) extended consultations provided better care coordination, and (3) patients want to be involved in planning their treatment and care. In focus groups, health-care professionals discussed two main themes: (1) patient-centered care and (2) culture and organizational change. Completion rates for questionnaires were 98% (47/48).Conclusions: Patients and health-care professionals found the CIM acceptable.

U2 - 10.1177/2235042X20935312

DO - 10.1177/2235042X20935312

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32844099

VL - 10

JO - Journal of Comorbidity

JF - Journal of Comorbidity

SN - 2235-042X

ER -

ID: 247931943